For law firms
Every filing, email and record for a case in one secure place. Ask questions in the AI you already use and get answers that cite the exact page.
At 112:4–19 Quinn agreed the gate was installed after the 2019 amendment and without an HOA vote.
DEPO_QUINN p.112from Dropboxvia Geistra
Item 2 (shared residence before 2023) and Item 5 (affidavits). Everything else is linked.
RFE_2024-04-11 §2, §5from USCISvia Geistra
Six providers, $84,310 billed. Mercy Orthopedics $38,420 with a $9,250 lien; one duplicate MRI charge flagged.
BILL_0033 · MED_0240from Outlookvia Geistra
It lives in inboxes, folders, spreadsheets and people’s heads. So every tool, every new hire and every AI starts from zero. Geistra gives the case one home.
Geistra remembers it for everyone: every session, every teammate, every AI tool.
Most AI tools forget between sessions, or keep memory only inside their own app. Source: Vendor documentation, Oct 2026.
Load all the files. All means all: we’ve analyzed cases with thousands of documents. Your AI finds what it needs on every page, and cites it.
Caps run 25 to 50 documents. A typical case runs to thousands. Source: Vendor help articles, Oct 2026.
It lives in one case file the firm owns. When someone leaves, the case stays.
Source: NALP.
Geistra turns orders into dates and checks every case each morning.
Source: ABA Profile of Legal Malpractice Claims, 2020–2023.
How it works
Outlook1,204 emails
Dropbox618 PDFsMost AI forgets when you close the chat. Geistra remembers.
2,612 documents. 22 discovery requests. One case.
Click a step to jump to its result. Press play to keep going.
Open the case. Asked: “Create a matter for Harlan v. Quinn and pull the public docket.”. Claude: Case set up. 6 filings are searchable; 4 claims and 1 counterclaim are drafted for your review.
Deadlines on the calendar. Asked: “Put every deadline from the scheduling order on the team's Outlook calendar.”. Claude: 6 deadlines and 2 prep meetings are on the team calendar, with the order attached. A stipulation just moved two dates; updated.
Load the documents. Asked: “Load the documents opposing counsel sent.” (attached PROD_001.zip · 2,612 files). Claude: 2,612 files are searchable. 6,410 pages, Bates numbers on every page, 318 photos searchable.
Match documents to requests. Asked: “Match these documents to our 22 discovery requests and flag problems.”. Claude: 22 requests matched. Three problems: RFP 9 contradicts ROG 5, RFP 14 privilege log is undated, RFP 11 has no documents.
Build the case strategy. Asked: “Build our factual theories from the claims and the evidence.”. Claude: Six theories, each linked to claims, evidence and gaps.
Then: “Lot 4 just sold (Dkt. 44). What changes?” Claude: Trespass and interference are moot. T1 is now strong. RFP 9, RFP 14 and ROG 5 move to urgent.
Share with your team. Asked: “Share it with the partners as a live app.”. Claude: Live at app.geistra.pro/s/harlan-quinn. Shared with 3 partners.
Closing card: The whole case, in one place. Geistra for law firms.
Everyone asks in plain English, in the AI they already use. Everyone works from the same case.
What are our strongest arguments, and what evidence are we still missing for each?
Each argument links to its evidence and the source pages.
Load the documents the other side sent and match them to our 22 requests.
About a week of a paralegal’s time at industry review rates of 50–60 documents an hour.
Put a team check-in on the calendar five business days before every deadline in this matter.
When a stipulation moves a date, the check-in moves with it.
Which active matters have a deadline in the next 14 days with no activity in the last 7?
No single chat can answer this. It takes every case in one place.
Every practice runs on documents. Pick yours.
Harlan v. Quinn Properties
Twenty-two request records: the request, the formal response, status, the responsive documents, notes. With the AI, the team mapped documents to requests, found contradictions and flagged refusals and privilege claims.
Okonkwo, I-130 / I-485
Each RFE item linked to the evidence that answers it, with gaps flagged before the response goes out.
Ruiz v. Carter Freight
Every bill to a provider, a date, an ICD code and a lien, with duplicates and gaps flagged.
In re Marriage of Alvarez
Each account to a statement to a period, with missing months and unexplained transfers flagged.
State v. Mbeki
Each item to a count and to a Brady request, with late and missing items flagged.
Your data belongs to your firm. Geistra never uses it to train AI. Export or delete any time. You own the data.
How we handle security and privilegeYour firm picks the AI. Your data stays in one secure place.
The first federal ruling on AI and privilege, United States v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y., Feb. 2026), denied protection where a client used a consumer AI tool on his own, under terms that allowed training and disclosure, without counsel's direction. It left the door open where counsel directs the work and the tool's terms keep it confidential. A month later, Morgan v. V2X (D. Colo., Mar. 2026) wrote that standard into a protective order: no training on inputs, no disclosure beyond the service, deletion on request, and written proof. Geistra is built to meet it.
Use Claude or ChatGPT on business plans that don’t train on your data. Documents stay in the U.S. Export or delete them any time.
Counsel opens the case, decides who can see what, and tells the team to work there. Every AI request happens inside that setup, and the case itself shows it.
Every change shows who made it, when, through which AI, and why. Attorney-only folders keep work product private. If two people change the same thing, Geistra shows both and asks which is right.
General background, not legal advice. Privilege rules vary by jurisdiction. Agree the approach with counsel before work begins.
Sample direction letter →Closing a case shouldn’t mean losing it. Your firm decides how long each case is kept, and when it goes.
30 minutes. Your own documents. We’ll load a case’s documents while you watch.
Security & privacy